Originally posted by Nightwing
I hope he doesn't make it for the simple fact that he bought the oscars: The academy awards should be given for one film, not THREE
They had the chance to give Jackson the director's award last year instead of giving it to ChicagoOriginally posted by Zepp
If it was given for three the awards would have been spread out and he probably would have ended up winning more awards...
you obviously haven't see Mystic river(or don't appreciate it...)but if the selection was bad enough for Penn to pick one up then the competition deserved to be blown out of the water...
The difference is, LOTR was made at the same time, while Star wars had the 3-year gapOriginally posted by Barada
Does that mean that none of the SW movies should have ever been nominated for any awards after ANH? They are, after all, one long continous movie split into separate films, just like LOTR.
EXACTLY! don't you think it's strange that the FOTR won 4 awards, TT won 2, and then ROTK won every category that it was nominated in- 11?!The fact is, it was released as a separate entity, and had to be treated as such. It's not like FOTR and TTT swept the awards the last two years.
Clint and Mystic River followed by Lost in Translation.Originally posted by Borsk
Nightwing, in your opinion, which movie and director should have won this year?
The Hobbit should be good as long as they don't involve Leonard Nimoy.