Lucas Loses Porn 'Toon Tiff

wookiee_cookiee

Moderator
Staff member
http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,9401,00.html


Lucas Loses Porn 'Toon Tiff
by Marcus Errico
Jan 18, 2002, 1:15 PM PT

This time, the Force wasn't with George Lucas.

The Jedi mastermind's Lucasfilm empire has struck out in the first round of its legal battle with some upstart pornographers. At issue: the X-rated Star Ballz cartoon.

Last week, a federal judge in San Francisco decided against blocking the sale of the animé saga of "Wank Solo," clearing the way for Star Ballz creator Media Market Group to resume hawking the $14.95 video online.

The case first attracted attention three months ago. Seeking to keep the family-friendly meaning of light saber intact, Lucas & Co. filed suit in October against Media Market Group, claiming Star Ballz shamelessly rips off Star Wars copyrights. The suit says Star Ballz is so similar to Star Wars that consumers could get the wrong impression and think Lucas had actually given his thumbs-up to the titillating 'toon.

Aside from the damage it could cause his good reputation, Lucas says Star Ballz could also negatively impact the sales of Star Wars-related merchandise, including videos, toys, games, books and CD-ROMs, potentially costing him millions of dollars.

Things looked promising at first for Lucasfilm. The court granted a temporary restraining order in December that prevented further manufacture, sale or distribution of Star Ballz until U.S. Distict Court Judge Claudia Wilken had a chance to review the case.

But on January 8, Judge Wilken came to the conclusion there was "little likelihood of confusion," and she decided to let Star Ballz continue to be sold pending a trial.

"The Star Wars films are so famous that is extremely unlikely that consumers would believe that Star Ballz is associated with Star Wars or Lucasfilm," the judge wrote in her decision.

The Media Market Group folks--who have insisted Star Ballz is simply a Scary Movie-like parody and is therefore protected under free speech rights--are trumpeting the ruling.

"This decision is an important First Amendment victory," Evan Feinberg, attorney for the New York-based company, says in a statement.

A note posted on the starballz.com Website was a bit more succinct in its evaluation: "Basically , it means...the judge reached the decision [Lucasfilm's] claims were a totally unfounded PILE OF CRAP."

Naturally, the Lucas camp doesn't quite see things that way.

"We respectfully disagree with the judge's decison on the preliminary injunction," says Lucasfilm spokeswoman Lynne Hale. "This is a pornographic cartoon utilizing Star Wars intellectual property. We feel strongly that the law does not allow for parody to be a defense to a pornographic use of someone else's intellectual property, especially when that use is directed to children."

Lucasfilm hasn't yet decided whether to appeal the judge's ruling. Even if Lucas doesn't appeal, his lawyers will still get a chance to make their case again. The suit will apparently go forward, although no trial date has been set.

Considering how valuable his franchise is, Lucas is fiercely protective of all things Star Wars and not afraid to resort to litigation. Last July, Lucasfilm blasted a medical-instruments maker for calling its newest gizmo--an energy beam-powered surgical device--the Light Saber.
 

BarneyFife

New Recruit
Who, on earth, would read star wars anime pron? I mean it is so STUPID! why is lucas wasting his money? People prbably arent gonna even pay attentions to star balls.
 

han solo

Friend of a Wookie
Those kind of porn sites a load of c*ap anyway you look at it. It's a poor use of time and I don't think SW fans would care/acknowledge stuff like that anyway.(I didn't know about the site until I read this post!) :saber:
 

Deathstar

Visit vacation paradise!
Round I

After reading the brief of the suit, I believe Lucasfilm's issues were frivious. Not that I support any type of porn productions, but these issues were not convincing enough to proceed in our legal process.
Star Wars' respectable brand name, I believe is not a major reason to censor anyones First Amendment Rights, unless there is infringment on trademark license products.
We may not always agree with the results of our legal system, but it's what we have to work with and the best in the world.
 

Redleader

New Recruit
I've taken a media law class in college and anybody that had any type of knowledge about that stuff knows they didn't have a chance. I think that they knew that but didn't want to sit there and do nothing while this was being made.

Have you ever just typed in star wars into the search engine at Ebay? I've run into some offensive stuff just by doing a general search sometimes. (You can also find some unique items that way too though)
 
Top